OpenAI PROVES DeepSeek COPIED Them!

Updated: February 26, 2025

TheAIGRID


Summary

Open AI recently accused Deep Seek of potentially using Open AI's outputs to train their own models, which could lead to a lawsuit for intellectual property infringement. Deep Seek's model, GBT-40, is believed to have distilled knowledge from Open AI's models, like GPT-5, raising concerns about ethics and IP infringement. The situation highlights the importance of proper authorization when using another company's outputs for AI model training to avoid legal and ethical issues, as seen in Open AI's actions to prevent misuse of their outputs by companies like Deep Seek. This case also brings attention to the risks and implications of utilizing another company's data for training AI models, including potential legal consequences and impacts on the industry, drawing parallels to past incidents of technology theft.


Allegations Against Deep Seek

Open AI accuses Deep Seek of using outputs from Open AI to train their model, potentially leading to a lawsuit for intellectual property infringement.

Key Evidence

A screenshot suggests that Deep Seek referred to itself as a model developed by Open AI, indicating potential use of Open AI's outputs for training.

Distillation Process

Deep Seek distilling knowledge from Open AI's models, like GPT-5, into cheaper models like GBT-40, raising concerns about IP infringement and ethics.

Training Process

Discussion on how Deep Seek possibly trained their model using Open AI's data without proper authorization, leading to ethical and legal issues.

Preventive Measures

Open AI taking steps to prevent misuse of their outputs by other companies like Deep Seek to maintain control and protect their intellectual property.

Concerns and Consequences

Exploration of the implications of using another company's outputs for training AI models, including legal risks and implications for the industry.

China's History of Copying

Reference to China's history of replicating technology, including a case of a Google engineer charged with stealing confidential files for Chinese companies.


FAQ

Q: What is Open AI accusing Deep Seek of?

A: Open AI is accusing Deep Seek of using outputs from Open AI to train their model, potentially leading to a lawsuit for intellectual property infringement.

Q: What process is Deep Seek accused of engaging in with regard to Open AI's outputs?

A: Deep Seek is accused of distilling knowledge from Open AI's models, like GPT-5, into cheaper models like GBT-40, which raises concerns about IP infringement and ethics.

Q: How did Deep Seek potentially train their model using Open AI's data?

A: Deep Seek possibly trained their model using Open AI's data without proper authorization, which has led to ethical and legal issues.

Q: What steps is Open AI taking to prevent misuse of their outputs?

A: Open AI is taking steps to prevent misuse of their outputs by other companies like Deep Seek to maintain control and protect their intellectual property.

Q: What are the implications of using another company's outputs for training AI models?

A: The implications include legal risks and implications for the industry.

Q: What historical reference is made in the discussion regarding technology replication?

A: There is a reference to China's history of replicating technology, including a case of a Google engineer charged with stealing confidential files for Chinese companies.

Logo

Get your own AI Agent Today

Thousands of businesses worldwide are using Chaindesk Generative AI platform.
Don't get left behind - start building your own custom AI chatbot now!